|
The Government introduced Sale of Lessor legislation in
Finance Act 2006 which targeted the sale of leasing companies. The aim of
the legislation was to target so-called “leasetail” transactions whereby a
lessor aims to avoid paying tax on profits arising in the later years of a
lease (when a company’s rental income is no longer sheltered by capital
allowances), by selling the “leasetail” company to a company with tax
losses. The legislation creates a deemed charge broadly equal to any
deferred tax liability on the balance sheet of the leasing company which
arises in the leasing company immediately prior to the disposal of the
business. An equal and opposite deduction is deemed to arise in the company
immediately following the disposal of the company.
The government announced in the 2006 Pre Budget Report
that they were going to target certain transactions which sought to reduce
or avoid a tax charge arising due to the Sale of Lessor rules.
Such transactions operated in two ways:
- By using the mismatch between the concepts of control
in the Sale of Lessor rules and in section 343 ICTA to avoid any
material Sale of Lessor charge arising.
- By reducing the balance sheet value of the relevant
assets so that the Sale of Lessor charge is reduced or eliminated.
The changes announced in the 2006 Pre Budget Report
affects transactions undertaken from 22 November 2006.
The Government has now introduced amended draft
legislation to ensure that the limitations placed on the eligibility for
s343 ICTA treatment which applied from 22 November 2006 to leasing companies
with an ultimate 100% shareholder will also apply to leasing subsidiaries
owned by consortia for transfers of leasing trades on or after 21 March
2007.
Our view
These changes are aimed at transactions undertaken in the financial
sector in order to ensure that the policy objectives of the Sale of
Lessor legislation are fulfilled. |
|